· Channel Economics

Subscription unit economics, explained

What makes a subscription business actually profitable?

A hands-on walkthrough of the core ideas behind any subscription business — LTV, CAC, payback period, contribution margin — using synthetic data modeled on real paid-acquisition patterns across three channels: Search, Display, and Performance Max.

US only PPC No-trial Forecast model

How a subscriber's value is actually calculated

Every dollar a channel brings in passes through the same bridge — sales, then refunds and servicing costs come out, then what it cost to acquire the customer. What's left is the channel's real contribution to the business.

Revenue bridge — latest cohort
Hover any bar for its exact figure and, on the collapsed steps, what it's made of.

CAC — Customer Acquisition Cost

What it costs, on average, to turn ad spend into one paying subscriber.

Ad spend ÷ new subscribers

LTV — Lifetime Value

The total sales a subscriber is expected to generate over their first 3 years, after refunds and servicing costs.

3yr sales − refunds − service costs

LTV : CAC ratio

For every $1 spent acquiring a customer, how many dollars of value comes back over 3 years. Healthy subscription businesses generally target 3× or more.

LTV ÷ CAC

Payback period

How many months of net revenue — sales after refunds and servicing costs, but before subtracting acquisition spend itself — it takes to earn back what was spent acquiring the customer. Shorter is better — it frees up cash to reinvest sooner.

CAC ÷ monthly net revenue per customer

Contribution margin

What's actually left from a cohort after refunds, servicing costs, expert payouts, and acquisition spend — the real economic contribution to the business.

Net revenue − CAC + lead-gen revenue

Channel snapshot

Side-by-side economics for the three channels. Recent cohorts are still young — the upfront payment (join fee and similar) is booked right away, but most of a new cohort's subscription revenue is still projected, not yet collected.

Channel details

Loading…

Contribution margin by Performance Max cohort
Cohort totals, colored by whether that month's cohort was profitable

Reading these numbers honestly

Recent cohorts are mostly forecast. The one-time upfront payment (join fee and similar) is booked right away, but a subscriber's monthly payments take up to 3 years to fully play out — so for a brand-new cohort, most of that recurring revenue is still projected, not yet collected. For example, — and these numbers will keep updating as those cohorts mature.
Payback period is a modeled estimate, not a measurement. The source data only has 3-year cohort totals, with no month-by-month revenue timeline, so payback assumes each cohort's net revenue (sales after refunds and servicing costs, before acquisition spend) accrues evenly over 36 months. It deliberately excludes acquisition cost from that monthly rate — that cost is what's being paid back, so it can't also be baked into the recovery rate.
"Conversions" is fractional, not a whole headcount. Values with decimals come straight from the underlying data model rather than a simple count — treat it as a very close proxy for new subscribers, not an exact number of people.
LTV:CAC and Net ROAS measure different things. LTV:CAC compares LTV (revenue after refunds and servicing costs) to spend. Net ROAS compares net revenue plus lead-gen revenue — LTV with expert payouts also subtracted — to spend, so it's a more fully-loaded number and usually a bit lower than LTV:CAC. Both are shown because they answer different questions, not because one is wrong.
Scope. This (synthetic) data models US, paid-search-family (PPC) traffic on a single no-trial subscription product — it is a slice of a hypothetical business, not the whole of it.